Thursday, April 26, 2012

Creative Commons Licenses on Audiotool

Hello!

I thought I'd take the time to write about what I've basically been able to sort out from the Creative Commons licenses with regard to Audiotool just to clear up any misunderstandings or confusion there may be about them. It's important that each of us on Audiotool takes the time to understand what the licenses mean for our music. The legal code can, at times, sound like a bunch of gibberish, so I thought it would be good to lay this out in a way that hopefully, we can all understand. Here it goes:

What is a Creative Commons License?
A Creative Commons license is a type of copyright license that allows other people to use your creative work in different ways. Depending on how much "permission" you want to give someone to use your work, you can choose from several different types of licenses.

Which License should I publish my tracks under in Audiotool? 
 Audiotool has 3 different licenses that you can publish under. They are:

1. CC BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike)
This license gives other people a lot of freedom on how they can use your creative work. This means they can remix it, make copies, adapt, perform it, and even sell your music WITHOUT your permission. Some people choose this license for the purpose of gaining more exposure. However, if you do not want your music to be sold by someone else without your permission, DO NOT publish your music under this license.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode

2. CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike)
This license still gives other people some freedom to use your work, but with one restriction. They can remix, make copies, adapt, and perform your music, but they CANNOT sell or make money off your music unless you give them permission. If you want to have control over whether your music gets sold or not, then use this license. Just be aware that this license does allow people to use your music, adapt, and distribute it freely as long as they don't sell it without your permission.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode

3. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
This license gives you the most control over your creative work. No one can make copies, perform your music, adapt, or sell your music without your permission whether they do it for free or not. If you want to have complete control over your creative work, this license would be the one to publish under. However, if you choose this license on Audiotool, other people will not be able to remix your tracks.

*NOTE: All of these licenses require anyone who decides to use your work to properly credit you, the creator. That's what the "BY" part of the license means, which stands for "Attribution." If anyone tries to say they are the creator of your work, they are breaking the rules of these licenses and are using your work ILLEGALLY.

Another point to note is that if anyone uses your work in a way that is derogatory or damaging to your reputation, they are also breaking the rules of these licenses.

Also, if you plan on publishing a remix or using anyone else's work, it's important to know that "SA", which stands for "ShareAlike", means that they are to be published under the same license. In Audiotool, that means certain samples and loops that have been uploaded under a certain license by another user will restrict you from publishing your track using a different license.

What else should I know about these licenses?
You can change the status of your license anytime. However, if someone is already selling your work in their collection or on their web site and if they have followed all the rules of the license you had it under previously, then technically, they have the legal right to continue to sell the work because you originally published it under that particular license. In other words, you cannot revoke or take back the license terms for works already in circulation. You can only change the current status of your license which prevents future works from being used in a manner that you don't want them to. Still confused? Here's an example:

Let's pretend I published a track titled "Happy Song" under the CC BY-SA license. Let's say a user on Audiotool  named Mr. Moneymaker decides he wants to sell "Happy Song" on Amazon and puts it up to make a profit. Let's say I get unhappy about this and change the license of "Happy Song" to ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Technically, Mr. Moneymaker can still sell "Happy Song" on Amazon because he started selling it BEFORE I changed the license. However, let's say another user named Miss GetRichFast decides to also try to sell "Happy Song" on Amazon, but AFTER I changed the license to ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. In this case, Miss GetRichFast would be breaching the terms of the license (breaking the rules) because she tried to sell "Happy Song" AFTER I changed it, and she could get into trouble for doing so. Mr. Moneymaker, however, is legally safe... even if he is a scheming money-making jerk-face. ;)

That's why it's important to be completely aware of what license you publish under so that you know what you may be getting yourself into, how much control, and what rights you have over your own music.

(See http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions under "For Licensors", 3rd bullet point.)

********************************************************************************
So that's the gist of it. The licenses are designed to give permission to others to use your works in various ways. Be sure to choose the one that best fits what you want with regard to your own music.

Please understand this information is not intended to discourage anyone from publishing their creative works under certain licenses. Nor is this, in any way, legal advice. I'm definitely not a lawyer. lol. The purpose of this is to inform people in a way they can understand so that they know what their options are and how they may be legally bound when they choose a particular license. Hopefully, this somewhat lengthy narrative makes things a little more clear and helps you make the choice that is most appropriate for your own music.

Also, if you notice anything that I've overlooked or that is incorrect in what is written above, please do let me know. Thank you kindly!

Links:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions

Happy music-making! :)

-oedi

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

The Last Transmission

One I made a while back. Not really satisfied with it, but here it is:

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Menara Petronas

A collaboration track by Kepz and I. Kepz is a massive talent and it was an honor working with him:

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Outer Space (Single)


I created this one a while back and the second track on the single features a remix by the masterful structure (A.K.A. Sandburgen). It's a free download off bandcamp. Enjoy!


My track on Audiotool:


structure's remix on Audiotool:

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

11. Badmotorfinger

Today's Pick:




People who don't like heavy rock are not going to like this album, but this was huge, and being someone from Seattle, it's not something I can easily ignore. Early 90s Seattle changed the face of rock. The ridiculous glam rock era shifted, and bands like Nirvana and Soundgarden changed that soundscape and brought reality to rock with its full grittiness and raw power. We grew up with this. Chris Cornell's voice is insane. He has a multi-octave range and is a veritable operatic rock demi-god, writing all his own lyrics and playing guitar. I didn't really appreciate the music until nearly a decade afterwards since I wasn't really into the heftiness of metal, but I can definitely appreciate it now for all its emotionality and intensity. The lyrics of "Jesus Christ Pose" and "New Damage" actually helped me cope and get over some things a few years back. The video I believe was banned from television for incorporating the symbol of the cross. People get really sensitive whenever the cross and other religious references are used in artistic expression. Really, the song and the raw suffering and anger is what resonates with me more than the imagery. Plus, I decided to post a live performance by the band in Bremerton back in 92. Oddly enough, he kind of looks like Captain Jack from "Pirates of the Caribbean." Mad times.



Wednesday, February 1, 2012

10. Automatic for the People

Today's Pick:




Some of these were big hits from the 90s. This album is timeless and a classic during a period when not only good music, but music with substance and depth was actually played on the radio. "Drive" is an emotionally powerful melody and "Everybody Hurts" was an anthem for the 90s that still resonates today. "Try Not To Breathe" has an Irish feeling to it, and I love "Man On The Moon" and "Find The River." Even though they've broken up, the band has left a legacy of music that I can still cherish in the present.



Sunday, January 29, 2012

9. Halcyon Digest

Today's Pick:




This album is a life saver to me. Just the themes that Bradford and Lockett cover in their lyrics has given me something to relate to. Illness, despair, loss, being abandoned, and being unable to relate to the rest of the world emanates from Bradford's lyrics. I just feel it so much. Lockett's "Fountain Stairs" and "Desire Lines" are pieces that contrast this sense of hopelessness and give me hope. Just an overall exquisite, beautiful album and one of my favorites of all time.